rules

1. Axioms of Economics, Introduction

Revised November 10, 2013

The Axioms of Economics clearly define differences among the parts of Economics.  The Axioms of Economics define distinct and separate parts in the field of Economics. For you music buffs, the Axioms of Economics define the system of Economics in a staccato manner.  Staccato, in music, is with each sound or note sharply detached or separated from one another.  The Axioms of Economics are laid out in a detached or separate manner from each other.

This is as apposed to legato, where you would find the parts flowing in a smooth flowing manner without breaks between them.  These distinct and separate parts will give an individual tools, confidence and certainty in his Economic knowledge and actions.

Today Economics is Confusing

The Axioms of Economics will allow you to differentiate each part of Economics from all the other parts of Economics.  Today the Field of Economics is very confusing.  There isn’t very much differentiation among the component parts of Economics.  Much of this confusion is created by the Counter-producers.  They identify themselves as Producers.  They are very well hidden.  They take the money, value, energy, wealth, capital and power that are created by the real Producers and turn it against them.  They use it to enslave the Producers and take more created production from them.

Differentiation in the field of Economics is very small, today.  It is almost like walking up to jet aircraft for the first time.  Someone asks you to perform avionics maintenance on the aircraft.  You observe almost no differentiation in parts.  This lack of differentiation in avionics parts is very confusing.  After training on the component parts, of the Aircraft, and their functions you gain some distinction and separation of parts.  You can differentiate the parts by observation and function.  Once you gain distinct and separate differentiation of parts and function you can expertly maintain the Avionics systems on that aircraft.  

There is a purpose in publishing the Axioms of Economics.  The purpose is to give a distinct and separate differentiation of parts and their function. With this distinction and separate differentiation of parts and function, you will be able to expertly maintain the Economics system.  

With the knowledge of the Axioms of Economics one will be able to maintain the Economic system.  An individual will be able to maintain his/her economic thrust in a prosperous direction.

Everyone should be able to operate with the distinct and separate parts of Economics.  Your life and living depends on you creating money, value, wealth, energy and power.  Your prosperity depends on you knowing the Axioms of Economics.  With this knowledge you can take responsibility for the money, value, energy, wealth, capital and power you create.  If you don’t take responsibility for what you have created the counter-producers will steal it and use it against you.  They will use it to get more of what you have created.  They will also use it to go as far as to enslave you!  History is riddled with examples of counter-producers taking the production from the Producers and enslaving them. 

Here is a very important point to remember.   Producers invest most of your time creating money, value, energy, wealth, capital and power.  You do this through the production of commodities, trades, goods and services.  The counter-producers use most of their time creating ways to steal, bleed or drain the money, value, energy, wealth, capital and power away from you.  They create an Economic system that is rigged to assist them in their counter-productive efforts.

The Axioms are the component parts in the field of Economics.  The Axioms are the differentiated parts in the field of Economics.  With the Axioms one will be able to locate where one stands in relation to the field of Economics.  An individual will be able to differentiate in the field of Economics. One will be able to locate who the Producers, non-producers and counter-producers are.  One will be able to differentiate among the Producers, Non-producers, and Counter-producers.  One will also be able to locate where one stands in relation to the Producer, the Non-producer and the Counter-producer.  Individuals will be able to determine whether they are in the category of a Producer, Non-producer or a Counter-producer.  If you discover yourself in a category you don’t want to be in, you will have the technology to evaluate your present category.  You can evaluate your present category and change it to the category you desire to be in.

Differentiation is recognizing distinct or separate parts.  The Axioms of Economics represent over 200 distinct and separate parts to the field of Economics.  With this much distinction and separateness in the field of Economics, an individual will be able to perform a great deal of evaluation.  This much distinction and separateness will remove much confusion in the field of Economics.

The Players

In the field of Economics we have the players.  The Producers are the players.  The Producers are the only players, no-exception.  The Producers create all of the money, value, energy, wealth, capital and power for the society in the Economic system.   Money, value, energy, wealth, capital and power do not exist unless it is created or generated by the Producers. All money, value, energy, wealth, capital and power are created through the production of commodities, trades, goods and services.

There exist two sets of non-players. The first of these two sets is the Non-producer.  The non-producers are dead weight and are being carried on the backs of the Producers.  They are on the outside of the Economic system taking money, value, energy, wealth, capital and power in exchange for nothing.  They create no production.

Then we have the second set of non-players, the pretend players.  The Counter-producers are the pretend players.  They are also riding on the backs of the Producers while actively destroying the Producers.  They are on the outside of the Economics System taking money, value, energy, wealth, capital and power in exchange for destructive creations.  They destroy the Economics system and the societies and take money in exchange for their destructive activities. 

Everyone can be located in one of the three categories.  The three categories are Producer, non-producer and counter-producer.  Next we will determine what each of these groups does and what they don’t do.  We will determine what each of these groups has and what each of these groups do not have.

This information will allow for the placement or location of the Producer on the Prosperity Scale.  This information will allow for the placement or location of the non-producer on the Prosperity scale.  This information will allow for the placement or location of the Counter-producer on the Prosperity Scale.

With this placement one can evaluate any of the three categories without political or personal bias.  He will be able to determine where on the Prosperity Scale any individual lies.  He won’t have to rely on his emotional feelings and other biases.  He will be able to extract himself from the lies, deception and propaganda of the counter-producer.  He will be able to determine who the non-producers are and decide whether or not to support them.

Prosperity Scale 3

 

Prosperity Scale

The Prosperity Scale measures an individuals prosperity thrust.   Producers have a prosperity thrust of plus ten.  Non-producers have a prosperity thrust of zero.  Counter-producers have a prosperity thrust of minus ten. 

What Producers do and have

We will start with what the Producers do and what they have. 

What do the Producers do?  They create commodities, trades, goods and services.  These are products.  They market the products on the Open Market, open to all on equal terms.  There are articles on http://youcreatemoney.com defining “Who are the Producers,” and “What is a Product.”  They maintain a constant money supply.  They make sure the person who created the product receives the money that was created in the process of creating the product.  They are constantly vigilant.  They protect and guard the money, value, energy, wealth, capital and power they have created. 

What do Producers have?  They have a high level of ethics.  They have a very strong prosperity thrust.  Producers create all the money, value, energy, wealth, capital and power an individual, family, organization, society, nation, and mankind has.  They have prosperous individuals, families, organizations, societies, nations, mankind and environments. Their environments are healthy and prosperous.  They reside in peace.  They have war as an absolute last solution.  Producers are at the top of the Prosperity Scale.  The Prosperity thrust of the Producer is at +10 on the Prosperity Scale. 

What Non-producers Do and Have

What do the non-producers do?  There are two classes of non-producers.  The first class is composed of the unable people.  They don’t create commodities, trades, goods and services.  They don’t create destructive goods and services.  They usually are found in a physical and/or mental condition of being unable to perform.  They have an inability to create commodities, trades, goods and services.  Their prosperity thrust on the Prosperity scale is zero.

There is a second class of non-producers who receive money for no production.  They are the able people who are paid to not produce.  They are the Farmers who receive government subsidies.  They are corporations who receive government subsidies. This is another class of able people placed on welfare.  Their prosperity thrust on the Prosperity Scale is zero.

What do the non-producers have?  The first class usually doesn’t have much in the way of material possessions.  Some of them don’t have the ability to create commodities, trades, goods and services.  Some of them have chosen to not use their ability to create commodities, trades, goods and services.  They reside around 0.0 on the Prosperity Scale. 

The second class of non-producers, who receive subsidies for no production, can have much in the way of money and material wealth.  They own Farms, Companies and Corporations, etc.  They reside around 0.0 on the Prosperity Scale.

What Counter-producers Do and Have

What do the counter-producers do?  They create destructive actions or things.  They operate monopolies.  They don’t use the Open Market.  They follow a free market concept.  The free market concept means, “We can do anything we want to do with marketing.”  For more information on the “The Free Market Construct,” go to http://youcreatemoney.com.  They steal money, value, energy, wealth, capital and power by exchanging destructive things for it. 

The counter-producers expand the money supply; stealing more money, value, energy, wealth, capital and power from the Producers.  They use the stolen money, value, energy, wealth, capital and power to take over governments, the media, the market and Banking.  They wage war for profit. 

They believe there is prosperity with “no government.”  See the article “No Government No Such Thing” in http://youcreatemoney.com.  Counter-producers don’t follow rules.  They believe freedom is the absence of all rules.  We have shown that all prosperity exists because rules have been and are being followed.  The highest level of prosperity for all life occurs when the rules governing prosperity for that life form are followed exactly.  This includes Man!  Their prosperity thrust on the Prosperity scale is minus ten.

What do the counter-producers have?  They have a very strong thrust to destroy prosperity.  They have third world countries.  They have recessions, depressions and wars.  Their environments are poisoned and destroyed.  They have large expansive estates.  They grab and hoard huge sums of money and material wealth.  They hoard Producers and make slaves of them.  They have profits from war material production.

They have a reversed prosperity thrust.  This means they create destructive actions and production.  Their prosperity thrust is at -10 on the Prosperity Scale.

We will look at examples of Producers, non-producers and counter-producers in action.   What would happen in Football, Baseball, Basketball, Cycling and Music when non-producers and counter-producers are allowed to openly participate?  As we have seen over the past 20 to 40 years, performance enhancing drug users are counter-producers.  They have caused great harm to themselves and their respective sport. I am sure there are a few non-producers and counter-producers still present in these games but they tend to be well hidden.  They are sought out and ejected when found.

In Economics we have counter-producers present as well.  They have caused great harm to themselves and all the societies of Earth.  They cause recessions, depressions and wars.  They cause destruction to their Planet.  They own governments, the media and for the most part the Producers.  The Government is the Official, the Umpire or the Referee in the Economic System.  What would happen if an owner of one particular team in a sport owned the Referees or the Umpires?  That sport would not function for very long.  It would be dead!   There would be no game.  One team would win everything!  Fans would stop purchasing their tickets.

In Economics the counter-producers thrust is to own the Umpires, the Referees and the Officials.  As we can see, when counter-producers own the Officials, the Referees and the Umpires in a particular society that society has a declining prosperity.   

Sport owners tend to know their sport will decline if a few teams own the Officials.  They are always working to make rules better.  They are always working to make sure the rules are applied correctly.  They are on alert to any counter-production.  They weed counter-production out when it is detected.  It is not a perfect system, but it works. The participants in sports are the Producing Owners, Officials, Coaches and Players.

 Without rules in Music, the sound would not be aesthetic, it would be painful.  In Cycling, they are cleaning up the game and ejecting the counter-producers.  In Baseball and Football there are penalties for using counter-production tactics. 

In Economics the Producers allow non-players, counter-producers and non-producers, in on their game.  There should be extreme penalties for some non-producer activities.  There should be extreme penalties for all counter-producer activities.

Where are the penalties in Economics?  The penalty in Economics should be a fine of three times the amount of money, value, energy, wealth, capital and power taken by counter-production activities.

Producer Rewarded Open Market Economics
The Science of Economics
By: RP Obrigewitsch
September 12, 2012

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Wednesday, September 12th, 2012 Axioms of Economics No Comments

III. Election Campaign Finance Tech

I am back from a week off practicing for a Halloween concert.  I play percussion in a Concert Band.  We had a great time!

 Introduction

 Before I start the article on Election Campaign Finance Technology I want to have the definition of Democracy understood with certainty.  There is some confusion on the definition of Democracy.  There is confusion between a Democracy and a Republic.  There really isn’t much difference between the two except in a Democracy you have “equal rights for all citizens.”  They can be the same or they can be slightly different.  The main deference is that in a Democracy we have a political or social system of equality, “all men are created equal.”  The political system in America is a Democratic Republic.  The definitions for both words were studied in several dictionaries.

The following definitions are from the Random House Dictionary of the English Language.

Democracy: 1. government by the people; a form of government in which the supreme power is vested in the people and exercised by them or by their elected agents under a free electoral system. 2. a state having such a form of government.  3. a state in which the supreme power is vested in the people and exercised directly by them rather than by elected representatives.  4. political or social equality; democratic spirit.

Republic:  1.  a state in which the supreme power rests in the body of citizens entitled to vote and is exercised by representatives chosen directly or indirectly by them.  2.  a state in which the head of government is an elected or nominated president, and not a monarch.

The political system in the United States aligns with the first definitions of both words.  The supreme power is vested or rests in the people or in the body of citizens entitled to vote.  The people, the voters, elect agents or representatives to exercise the supreme power of the people.  This gives us a Democratic Republic political system in the United States.

In a Democracy there may be a choice between how the supreme power can be exercised.  The supreme power can be exercised directly by the people or by their elected agents or representatives.  Also, “all men are created equal” in the Declaration of Independence aligns with definition four of Democracy.  This is where the concept of equal rights arises.  We have the right to a system of political or social equality.

The non-producers work to take that basic unalienable right away from us.  By arguing that we are a Republic, they can say they have more power and rights, because of their wealth, than the majority of the citizens.  Then they can covertly seek to force their domination over the producers and create a slave state.  In this type of a society they can continue to steal the wealth from the producing citizens.  This must not be allowed to continue!  This rewarding of non-producers has continued too long on this planet.  It has resulted in much suffering, recessions, depressions, and wars, to say the least.

The rich and powerful non-producers fear the producing citizens will exercising their supreme power directly without elected representative.  With the electronics available today this could become a reality.  If the producing citizens exercised their supreme power directly the rich and powerful non-producers would have a very hard time controlling all the citizen producers.  In a strictly representative form of government they can and have been controlling the representatives with their money and power.

In a Republic the supreme power is exercised by representatives chosen directly or indirectly by the citizens.  There is no choice as to whether citizens can exercise their supreme power directly.  Their supreme power can only be exercised by representatives chosen by them.

It has become increasingly apparent that the supreme power is being taken from the people at large and is being placed into the hands of a small minority of ultra rich citizens and corporations.  Many of these ultra rich are rewarded non-producers, taking huge sums of wealth without the correct exchange in produced, by them, goods and services.  The vast majority of citizens have been slowly loosing the supreme power that is supposed to be vested in them to the ultra rich non-producers.  This article covering the Election Campaign Finance Technology is a set of rules that will insure all citizens have their right of supreme power.  All citizens have the right to equal supreme power to use in electing their representative.

The Article

 The following article contains a set of rules for election campaign contributions.  This is a set of rules which aligns with the intent of the Preamble of the U. S. Constitution and the Constitution of the United States of America.  It also aligns with the intent of the Declaration of Independence.  It is a Democratic set of rules regulating election campaign contributions.

This system of rules frees politicians from being bought and pressured by big business, the wealthy and political action committees.  This set of rules would free politicians from being bought and influenced by individuals of foreign citizenship, by foreign governments, foreign companies and by individuals of American citizenship residing outside of a specific politician’s district of representation.

Elections would become truly Democratic affairs.  We would see the principle of one-man-one-vote truly implemented.  Today and in the past big money, with excess campaign contributions, has or had more than one-man-one-vote!  Excess campaign contributions give the large money contributor much more power in selecting who gets on the ballot and then who wins in the final election.  This is allowed to happen in a “supposedly Democratic Society.”  A wealthy individual or group can have a much, much greater influence on swaying an election, thus they in effect have much more power than what one-man-one-vote would allow them to have.  This is not a Democracy, it is not the self evident truth of  “all men are created equal.”    This also violates our unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.”

Contributing money is like voting.  The more money an individual contributes, the more votes he has.  Money can be counted as votes.  Money is not speech.  In a Democracy the main principle is, “all men are created equal.”  Using the Rules of Election Campaign Finance Technology we put in the equal vote for all.  All citizens, in a Democracy must have equal access to the process of electing representatives.  Also, in a Democracy, all citizens, must have equal free speech.  If either of these is violated then we don’t have a Democracy, we have minority rule.  Minority rule leads to Authoritarian rule.  Authoritarian rule results in Fascist and Communist type government systems.  This is traveling down the death spiral road to succumb for a society.

Democracy, “all men are created equal,” is a pro-survival governmental system.  Anything less than, “all men are created equal,” is on the road to succumb for a society.  This is riding down the death spiral for the society.  With Democracy a society is riding on the survive spiral.

There may be one exception when it comes to voting and campaign finance.  “Non-producers do not have the right to vote or contribute to any election campaign while functioning as non-producers.  When they re-form and become producers then they gain the right to vote and contribute to election campaigns.”

 Non-producers have as their purpose to succumb and take the society with them.  They are destroying a society by taking money without exchanging goods and services for it.  In many cases they create contra-survival activities and contra-survival goods and services.  These contra-survival activities, goods and services are things that are destructive to the survival of their fellow man, the society and themselves.

When they are allowed to vote and contribute to an election system they vote and contribute to contra-survival candidates, initiatives and referendums.  They pull a society down to succumb.  They destroy themselves, their families, their society and their Nation.  Non-producers are on the death spiral.  They work to take all around them down with them.

Allowing big money to contribute huge amounts of money to a political campaign and thus giving big money a much, much greater influence on determining the outcome of an election violates the first clause, after the Preamble, in the Declaration of Independence.  This situation violates the, “all men are created equal,” part of the clause.  This situation also violates the, “unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness,” part of the clause.

This is the first clause of the Declaration of Independence following the Preamble:

“We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.”

 The Rules

 RULE ONE:   No candidate for public office shall receive any money from any source other than the Citizens of the United States of America for political campaign funding.

RULE TWO:   No candidate shall receive any money from outside of that candidate’s district of representation for campaign funding.

  1. Candidates for President of the United States have the citizens residing and voting across the whole country as potential campaign contributors.
  2. Candidates for Senator of each State have those citizens residing and voting in their State as potential campaign contributors.
  3. Candidates for the U.S. Congress have the people residing and voting in their Congressional Districts as potential campaign contributors.
  4. These rules also apply to all state and local candidates for public offices.
    1. Candidates for State Governor have, the citizens residing and voting in the State the candidate is running for Governor in, as potential campaign contributors.
    2. All candidates for State Legislative Offices have, the citizens residing and voting in the District the candidate is running for office in, as potential campaign contributors.
    3. Candidates running for Mayor have, the citizens who reside and vote in the City the candidate is running for Mayer in, as potential campaign contributors.
    4. All other candidates for any other public office must take campaign contributions only from voters who reside and vote in the district the candidate is seeking office in.
    5. All Referendums and Initiatives placed on the Election Ballot could only be funded by citizens who reside and vote in the State or District where the Referendum or Initiative applies.

 RULE THREE:   No Company, Corporation or Group of any kind, what-so-ever, can contribute to any campaign fund what-so-ever or operate a separate campaign fund (example, Political Action Committee.)  Money for political campaigns can only come from individual citizens who are eligible to vote in the United States.

RULE FOUR:   Each candidate shall have only one campaign fund.  There may not be any political action committee or any other campaign fund operated separate from the individual candidate’s campaign fund.

RULE FIVE:   Only individual people can contribute to a campaign fund!  For these are the only and true entities for which this Democratic Republic Stands.  Individuals are the basic building blocks of the Democratic Republic.  From individuals we build families and groups.  Individuals are the only entities that can vote in elections, therefore only individuals can be the only entities who are allowed to contribute to a campaign fund.  Groups can’t vote!  Only individuals vote!

RULE SIX:   No one individual shall contribute more that five hundred dollars to any one campaign fund in a given campaign.

RULE SEVEN:   An individual can contribute to as many election campaigns as he is eligible to vote in.  He shall only contribute a maximum of 500 dollars to each campaign fund.

RULE EIGHT:   The violation of any of these rules by a political candidate intentionally or unintentionally is a felony.  It is also a felony for people running campaigns for Referendums or Initiatives to violate any of these rules.  It is also a felony to contribute to a campaign the individual is not eligible to vote in.  As a penalty, the violator is barred from participating as a candidate for any public office for the duration of his or her life.  If the violation is discovered after the candidate has won an election, the violator is immediately dismissed from office.  The vacated position is refilled through existing rules and laws that cover vacancies for death, resignations and etc.

With Referendums or Initiatives, if these Rules are violated, the violators are charged with a felony and the Referendum or Initiative is voided and placed on the Ballot for the next election cycle.

 Conclusion

 These Rules are necessary because we as a Nation are loosing our Democratic Republic political system to the rule of a few rich non-producers.  They are taking the supreme power that is vested in the people and placing it into their own hands.  Many of these rich non-producers are on a death spiral affecting themselves and their society.  This is not Democratic rule, it is an Authoritarian rule.

A 1% of minority has stolen the supreme power from the citizens and is ruling with their massive campaign contributions to candidates.  These candidates will reward them handsomely with large military spending and policies which allow the owners of companies to take larger and larger profits from the working producers.  These profits come from the profits of the working producers who create the wealth.  These massive campaign contributions help set an economic climate that allows speculators to take huge amounts of money out of the Market with, very little and in most cases, no exchange for it.  This situation sets up a massive “redistribution of wealth” from the working Producers and places that wealth into the hands of the rich non-producers.  This is a system of “class warfare.”  It is the rich non-producers who are waging “class warfare and redistributing wealth.”

This Country was set up as a Democratic Republic style Government which represents individual citizens.  This Country was set up to be Government by the Rule of a simple majority across the board.  The only exception is the two thirds required to override an Executive Veto.  All other votes are required to be by a simple majority.

Any thing more than a simple majority leads to a “Rule by the Minority.”  Example; if a Legislative House requires a 60% vote to pass legislation then 40% of the Legislatures can control that Legislative House.  This is minority rule.  Logically this sounds good that a 60% majority vote is required. However, it allows a minority of 40% to stop Legislative activity.  The rich and powerful non-producers like this because it opens the door for them to control the majority of the citizens.

Companies, corporations or any other groups are represented indirectly through the citizens of the country.

Citizens are the true bodies which are and can be represented by this Democratic Republic.  Human beings, the citizens, rightfully are the only entities who may contribute to any political campaign.

Any contribution made by any group shall be deemed illegal since a group is not an individual citizen and thus not represented directly by the government. A group does not vote!  The individuals of the group vote!

A group is made up of individuals who are the direct recipients of this Democratic Republic’s representation.  Companies, corporation and groups are not alive in the true sense of the word alive.  If the people who make up these companies, corporations and groups are removed, all that remains are substances of the physical universe.  All life, which is vested in human beings, would be removed.

Human beings give groups their life!  Without the presence of human life groups do not exist!

This Democratic Republic represents living citizens or living individuals.

The principle that individuals are directly represented by the Democratic Republican Government of this land is a self evident truth.

Individuals vote for their representatives.  Companies, corporations and groups do not vote.  Individuals have the power and the privilege to donate to election campaigns.

A limit is placed on the amount of money that one individual may donate to an election campaign because a wealthy individual can have more power and influence by donating large sums of money to specific political candidates and causes.  Therefore, a 500 dollar limit brings the power and influence of a wealthy individual into proper alignment or perspective with the power and influence of the less wealthy citizens.

These Rules are a Democratic set of principles which fall in line with the Constitution of the United States.  The present system of campaign contributions violates the spirit of the Constitution.

Allowing campaign contributions to be accepted from areas outside of the candidate’s City, District, County, State or Country is misrepresentation.  People from another voting area have no right to have any influence in the elections outside of their voting area.

When donating funds to a campaign in another City, District, County, State or Country an individual is influencing the political process where he does not reside.  This is like casting votes of influence outside his legal residence.

Donating money is like votes.  The more money an individual donates the more votes he is placing.  Money in reality is a form votes.

Technology of Democracy
By RP Obrigewitsch
October 26, 2011

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Monday, November 7th, 2011 Technology of Democracy Articles No Comments

I. No Government, No Such Thing

Revised November 22, 2013

In this article; No Government, No Such Thing, we will see there is no such thing as no government.  As long as individuals are alive, there will always be some sort of government.  Governments can range from being very Democratic to being very heavily totalitarian.   It is much harder to set up a Democratic Government.  When people rid themselves of a Democratic Government, a Totalitarian Government is waiting on the sidelines.  With the absence of a government it is very easy for Totalitarianism to move in.

Government, what is it?  Many people want to rid themselves of Government.  They want to get rid of Government.  However hard they try they can’t seem to accomplish that task.  In order to understand why man has failed to accomplish this task over the past several thousand years you would have to look at man himself.

Government is composed of rules.  These rules are established from how man lives in order to exist and prosper.  Certain basic rules are followed by the various groups of man on planet earth.  All groups have some rules in common.  Each group has rules that apply to their specific environment and culture in which they exist.

All Governments are composed of rules that apply to their specific environment and cultural development.  Some of the rules become laws because they are very important for the existence and prosperity of the group.  Not only is the group creating existence, it is working and laboring toward achieving prosperity.

There is no such thing as “No Government.” There is only one way to have, “No Government.”  The way to have no government is to have no human being alive on planet earth.  As long as we have one human being alive on the planet there will be a Government. This Government is composed of the rules by which this individual lives, works and labors while achieving existence and prosperity.

People who promote the concept of “No Government” are either very ignorant or are criminals.  Criminals don’t apply the rules of the group, they pretend to be a part of.   They don’t operate by using prosperity creating rules.  Criminals find ways to live outside of the defining rules of the group.  They violate the rules that define the group.  Violating the defining rules of a group brings harm to the individuals in the group.  Violating the rules of the group destroys the prosperity and existence of the group.

The reason I say, “pretend to be a part of,” is they in reality are not part of the group they say they are.  They are not part of the group because they are not applying the defining rules of this group.  They are not applying the rules that make the group prosper and exist.  When individuals violate group rules, they are not “in the group!”  When individuals aren’t applying the rules of the group they profess to be a part of, they are really on the outside.  Groups are defined by rules of operation.  When these rules of operation are not being applied the individual is simply not in the group that is defined by the specific rules.

This is not to say rules can’t be changed. Rules will be changed based on changing environmental conditions and changes brought by technological advances.

Examples of conditions brought about by rules not being applied or efforts being made to rid a Nation of Government are financial collapses, wars, recessions and depressions.

What would happen if we got rid of the Governing bodies of professional sports industries? I think you could guess without much looking and studying.  A specific sport would no longer be defined.  They would cease to exist.  The sports industries would go into a state of chaos and cease to exist. This happens to other industries and to countries as well.

The field of Music is governed by very strict exact rules. What would happen to the field of Music if we abandoned all the rules?  We would end up with noise and very irritating noise. This field would cease to exist. It would become a dead field.

What would happen to a transportation system if we threw out all rules of engineering?  Roads would cease to exist.  Automobiles would cease to exist.  Trains, trucks, ships and airplanes would all disappear.

What would happen if we threw out the US Constitution?  We would cease to exist as a nation.  We would all be individuals operating by separate rules.  There would be chaos.  Totalitarian criminal individuals would establish a government.  They would put in their “rules” with might and force.  We would have a Totalitarian form of government.  Existence would be difficult to achieve.  Prosperity would be a far off dream.  Slavery would be the “rule” of the day.  Whenever you rid yourself of government there is always another form of government waiting on the sidelines to move in and force itself on you.  We must take responsibility for a government that establishes Equal Rights, Justice, domestic Tranquility, Common Defense, the General Welfare, and secures the Blessings of Liberty and Prosperity to its citizens and its future citizens.

It is self-evident, there is no such thing as, “No Government.”  There is only good-existence and prosperity-creating Government or bad criminal government.  We get bad criminal government when people attempt to rid themselves of government.  We get bad criminal government when individuals take office and do not enforce the defining rules and laws of a nation.  When someone takes a government office and destroys or dismantles the defining rules, they are dismantling their country.

When people rid themselves of government they are simply changing their existing rules for some new unknown set of rules.   Before you rid yourself of your present government you must set up a new set of defining rules that give your country a better state of existence and a greater prosperity potential.  It must be a better set of rules that give greater levels of prosperity to all in the Nation.  If you don’t have a preset set of rules established before hand, a totalitarian will impose his rule on you.  There will always be some sort of government present.  You can’t rid yourself of government.  It is best to stay with a government that establishes defining rules that give a good existence and prosperity for the greatest number of the citizens.   It is better to stay with a government that gives a good existence and prosperity than to throw it all out and take a gamble for a better government.  The chances of getting a better government are very slim.  The chances of getting a Totalitarian Government and slavery are very, very great.  Counter-producers are only too happy to throw out a good prosperity creating government and replacing it with a Totalitarian Slave state.

People who believe we can get rid of government should not ever be placed into any governmental office. Their purpose is to destroy themselves, their society and their nation.

Every country is defined by very specific rules.  These rules are agreed upon by the citizens of the country.  Rules defining a family, organization, society and nation can be changed.  This change should be in the direction of creating a better existence and prosperity for the greatest numbers of individuals in the group.  See the articles on “True Wealth!” in http://youcreatemoney.com.

Technology of Democracy
Raymond P Obrigewitsch
October 13, 2008

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

 

facebook