You Create Money

1.9 Production Creates Futures

A future is the ability and desire to look and plan ahead in time or in time to come or in time to be.  A future of a Society depends upon the production level of the Society.

The future of a Society depends upon the wealth created by the Producers in the Society.

The future of a Society depends upon the Producers of the wealth and money to be exactly rewarded (paid) for that which they have created in the production of goods and services.  Producers create future.  Non-producers take future away.  The amount of future in a Society is directly related to the amount of production being created in the Society.  All the future of the rewarded non-producers rests on the backs of the Producers.  The rewarded non-producers and the non-producers have no future of their own!  As the rewarded non-producers take more money units or wealth without exchanging goods or services for it, they destroy the future of the Producers as well as their own future.

As rewarding non-production increases, allowing people to take money without exchanging their produced goods and services for it, the future of the Society decreases.

Non-producers don’t have a future

Non-producers don’t have a future and when they take money without production they are creating a negative future.  They are destroyers of future.  Producers have a future and are continuously creating one. Rewarded non-producers, continuously by their very existence, are taking the future out of the Society.  So, as the number of rewarded non-producers increase, future decreases.  As the amount of money taken by non-producers increases future decreases more rapidly.  There is an inverse relation between the amount of money going to rewarded non-producers and future.  The more money taken by non-producers without exchanging production for it the faster the future disappears.

The future of a Society diminishes as non-producers are rewarded.  As non-production is rewarded more people strive toward becoming rewarded non-producers.  As the number of rewarded non-producers increase there are fewer and fewer producers.  This causes production levels in the society to decrease.  This drop in production causes the costs of goods and services to increase because there are fewer and fewer goods and services on the Open Market.  With fewer goods and services on the Open Market the demand for them increases.  This is caused by the non-producers not placing production on the Open Market in exchange for the money units they have taken out, so now there are fewer products on the Open Market in relation to the amount of money in circulation.  Money value decreases as the cost of goods and services increase, which means it now takes more money units to purchase the same needs in order to survive.

Maintaining the Axioms of Producer Economics gives the Society a future.  Maintaining the Axioms of Producer Economics also gives each individual a future.

Rewarding the Producers of the wealth and money they create will give the Individual, the family, the Society, the Nation and Mankind increasing future.  The Individual, the family, the Society, the Nation and Mankind can look and plan for future time to come and future time to be.

Hope is spawned

This is where hope is spawned.  Hope is the perception of good feeling and confidence about life when one can look into the future and know he or she can create a future time to come or a future time to be.  This is hope.

Rewarding non-production shuts down a future view point.  It also shuts down hope. Hope diminishes as the future view shortens.  Rewarding non-production shrinks the perception of a view of the future.  People with the perception of no or limited future have diminishing morale.  As rewarding non-production increases, the view of the future diminishes and the morale diminishes as well.  Production in the Society also decreases.

The above information about the future is obvious when we study the producing upper middle class, the middle class and the producing poor.  It also is obvious when we study the non-producing upper middle class, the non-producing middle class and the non-producing poor.  The above information about the future is not so obvious when we study the rewarded rich non-producers.  Rewarding the rich non-producers gives the apparency of well-being in a society.

We find as the Producer Rewarded Open Market Economic Axioms are violated by the non-producing rich, in taking money without an exchange for it on the Open Market, their future also diminishes along with the future of the Society.  This causes the Money Velocity and money value to decrease across the Society, starting the economy to recede. The Producers, the rich non-producers survive off of, drop their production levels as a result of rewarding non-production.   They also loose production positions in the companies of the Society as a result of the rich non-producers being in an out-exchange condition.  With production decreasing by the Producers, the future of the rich non-producers diminishes.  They dramatize this loss of money flowing to them and a fear of a diminished future by redistributing more money away from the Producers and placing it into their pockets.

Rich non-producers redistribute wealth

The rich non-producers redistribute money and wealth by gaining political power and set up subsidy programs (rich and well to do on welfare programs) they move money to themselves without an exchange in goods and services for it. They run government programs that pay them for no production in exchange for the money.  They set up government sanctioned monopolies to control the market and cause inflated prices for their products.

They gain political power and prevent the enforcement of laws.  These laws were set up to prevent non-producers from being out exchange in running monopolies, speculating on commodities, bidding up the price of the commodities, then selling them off with no production what-so-ever in exchange for the huge sums of money they take.  Oil is an example of parasitic speculation. We the producers pay for this parasitic action when we purchase these commodities to be used in our production.   These commodities have  inflated prices caused by speculation. They bid up the stock market.  When it has a very high value, they crash it, taking huge sums of wealth with them.  Wealth from Stocks they sold off when the stocks were at their highest value.  They cause the Stock Market to crash by selling off huge volumes of Stock in a short period of time.  After they crash the Stock Market they plead with the government to bail out the remaining rich non-producers who lost their shirts in this corrupt process.

Since they hold the power in the government, they use the government to redistribute huge sums of wealth to them.  Where does this money come from?  Of course it comes from you and me who are the producers of it.  Now the Producers get whacked twice, first by our losses in the Stock Market and second when we pay for the bail-out to the rich non-producers who initially crashed the Market and took the wealth with them as they crashed it.  The rich non-producers work at capitalizing the profits and socializing their losses.  They say they dislike socialism!  They are by far the most socialistic.  They take money both ways, when they win and when they loose.

They take power and don’t enforce the laws that protect the producers.  These laws are used to maintain wages that reflect the correct exchange for production.  They monopolize the media and call it Free Speech and Free Press.  Their idea of Free Speech is to monopolize it and have all of it.

Rewarding rich non-production results in a dwindling spiral.  As they take more money and wealth away from the Producers, production in the Producing groups drops even farther.  The rich non-producers solution is to take even more wealth from the Producers.  The rich non-producers future as well as the future of the whole Society is diminishing.  They are stealing the future right out of the Society.

Media monopoly

The rich non-producers, as production falls, strive to take more wealth and money created by the producers.  Their solution is to monopolize the media and pay large salaries to propagandists who practice propaganda on a daily basis.  The propagandists create issues to take the attention off the rich non-producers as the responsible source for the economic decline.

The propagandists don’t practice Free Speech in the form of everyone having equal access to speech.  They don’t practice Free Speech as one would find in a Democracy.  People who are real Democratists encourage each other to exchange ideas.  This is real Free Speech!

The propagandists, paid by the rich non-producers, use speech to attack and assault anyone with different view points.  They use “Free Speech” to assault Producers who express their views in trying to handle the dwindling economic situation.  The propagandists don’t debate the issues with facts.  They verbally attack and assault the persons working to right the Economic Ship.

The propagandists attack and tear down their own government and call themselves Patriots.  They attack the good and glorify evil.  In their propaganda, good is bad and bad is good.  By the way, this is a corner stone in Communist propaganda.  However, this is not exclusive to operating Communism.  After all, Communism is a rewarded non-producer system.

The propagandist will make up issues and use fear, hate, anger, hostility, mental anguish, mental pain and covert hostility to enforce their views on the producers.  The rich non-producers will in desperation create issues and then attack against them.  Examples of such issues are gay rights, abortion, and deficit spending.  They will deficit spend and then run against deficit spending.  When they get to political power they don’t stop deficit spending, they deficit spend like there is no tomorrow.  They spend like there is no tomorrow because they don’t have a future to view, they don’t have a tomorrow.  They are very short sighted, they are stuck in the past dramatizing the past while wrecking the present and the future for themselves and everyone else.

The rich non-producers run against gay rights and abortion.  They aren’t really interested in preventing gay rights and abortion from occurring, they’re interests lay in stirring everyone up with heavy emotion to mask the real issue of the rich non-producers taking money and wealth without any exchange for it on the Open Market..  Gay and abortion activities have been with Man almost since the beginning of time.  These activities have been made illegal in the past.  Gay and abortion activities having been illegal hasn’t stop these activities.  These issues are moral and ethical issues.  They need to stay out of the Legal part of the Society with few exceptions.

Minority rule

The rich non-producers use these issues to emotionally control the Producers, so they vote for the rich non-producer candidates.  Once the rich non-producers’ candidates win and take office they engage in taking more wealth from the Producers and redistributing it to the rich non-producers.  They take power and set up governments to run by minority rule.  By requiring a two thirds vote in legislatures for passing budgets, taxation and other issues they, in reality have set up a government they can control with only one third of the seats in the legislatures.  This is minority rule, contrary to the principles of Democracy.  They set up the Federal Senate to be controlled by a minority of 41 percent.  It takes 60 percent to pass legislation in the Senate.  A minority of 41 percent can stop the legislation, this is minority rule.  They put in term limits so they can come back to power more rapidly after they have stolen the future out of the Society that led to their losses in the previous elections.

In a Democracy majority rule is always used and that is by a simple majority, fifty one percent.  Anything more than fifty one percent gives the minority power to rule.  Term limits are never found in a Democracy.  If term limits exist, it is not a true Democracy but a system where non-producers have given themselves a way to get back to power.  When back in power they take over control of the economy and take more money and wealth from the Society without exchanging goods and services for it.

The rich non-producers use war as another way to redistribute wealth in huge sums from the Producers into the hands of the rich non-producers who are in power.

Future

What does rewarding non-production do to the future of the Society?  It shortens its future to the point where there is almost no future!

A Society with no Economic future is in an Economic depression!  A Society in an Economic recession is seeing its future receding.  It is becoming shorter and shorter as the recession deepens.  When the economy totally collapses there is no future but death.

Remember future has length.  With more prosperity as a result of rewarding Producers we see a longer and longer view into the future.  With less prosperity caused by rewarding non-production we see a shorter and shorter view into the future.

The future can be viewed a long way down the road when a Society and a Nation are prosperous.  This view can go into years and into many years and decades.  We don’t know how far into the future we can look with the Axioms placed into use for a long period of time.  The Axioms of Economics haven’t been put into use over a long period of time, in the past, before the non-producers gain power with lies and propaganda and demolish the Economic systems again.   It has been a constant battle with the non-producers, across the whole spectrum of non-producers, from rich to poor.  They are too willing to work very hard to demolish an economic system.  If they would only direct their energy to the production of goods and services in exchange, on the Open Market, for their money we would all have prosperity.

The future, with the rewarding of non-production, can be very short.  It can be so short that death is the only future!  We see this taking place in Societies where tremendous suppression on the Economic lines takes place.  The rich non-producers in power have almost all the wealth and money and the Producers are left with a future of death.

In these cases the rich non-producers may have all the wealth but their future is also very short.  They can’t project very far into the future because the threat of death is always knocking at their doors.  They are in a constant state of fear.  They are concerned about being handled by those they suppress.  The rich non-producers’ greatest fear is that they will be handled by the Producers they suppress, like they have handled them.

I once knew a rich man who would obsessively think about what would happen when the poor people would decide to come after him.  He built a very fortified house surrounded on three sides by water.  He talked of building a tall wall along the fourth side to prevent people having access to his house.

The rich non-producers, in any Society, with their highly paid propagandists will control the Society by the use of heavy emotion repeated on a daily bases.  This is brain washing!  This form of brain washing is in common practice in Communist and Fascist Societies.

In a Democracy

In a Democracy, heavy emotion brain washing is nowhere to be found.  In a Democracy people treat each other with respect and make sure everyone can speak their minds freely.  In a Democracy people work with each other on an analytical level.  They consult each other analytically and rule by the use of reason.  They steer away from the use of control by heavy emotion.  We find control by the use of heavy emotion, in non-producer rewarded Societies.  If you see control by the use of heavy emotion, you can be assured that there is rewarded non-production taking place in that area.

In a Democracy we see rule by simple majority, fifty one percent.  The only exception would be the two thirds needed to override the Head of State’s veto.  In a Democracy we don’t see term limits for any political office.  The people decide, at every election, whether or not to terminate an incumbent’s time in office.

In a Democracy the Producers are rewarded and rewarding non-production is shut down.  As a result, in a Democracy we see a long future in the view of the individuals and in the view of the Society and Nation.

In a Producer Rewarded Open Market Society we find rewarded rich Producers and Producers of all economic levels who make sure all Producers are receiving, in money units, the value they have created in production, no more and no less.  We see many rich Producers flourish and prosper with long futures in which to look into and to be in.  We see all Producers in a Producer Rewarded Open Market Society with long futures to look forward to being in.  We see a very sane Society with very low crime and very little occasion for anything remotely like war.  We see very few non-producers.  The only rewarded non-producers are those who absolutely are not able to produce at all.  There are so few of them that non-profit charities can care for them.

In a Producer Rewarded Open Market Society a long view of a future gives the perception of good feeling and confidence.  There is a high level of hope and a long future to plan ahead for time to come and for time to be.

Producer Rewarded Open Market Economics
The Science of Economics
By: R P Obrigewitsch
June 20, 2011

Tags: capitalism, Democracy, economics, free speech, future, hope, minority rule, money, non-producers, Open Market, producers, production, propagandists, redistribute wealth, wealth

No comments yet.

Leave a comment